This link has been bookmarked by 25 people . It was first bookmarked on 06 Aug 2007, by Johannes Liegl.
-
05 Dec 14
-
13 Sep 12
-
27 Nov 11
-
06 Sep 11
-
21 Dec 10
-
08 Sep 10
-
04 Sep 10
-
26 Jan 10
-
21 Nov 09
-
14 Feb 09
-
22 Sep 08
-
05 Sep 08
-
- In the arts, the pathetic fallacy is the act of ascribing human feelings to inanimate objects. We argue that the same fallacy is turning up on the semantic web---that researchers are (perhaps subconsciously) allowing the computer's internal representation of data to influence the way their tools present information to users, when instead they should developing interfaces that are based on the users' needs, independent of the computer's particular information representation.
- what knowledge these graphs communicate,
- what tasks they support, and
- whether these are the optimal paradigms for such communication and tasks.
In the following discussion, we will look at some examples of the pathetic fallacy in terms of the interaction challenge ofFrom this context, we investigate two questions: Are graphs the right default representation for the Semantic Web? And if not, how might we think about default presentations for the Semantic Web in order to make accessible its promised benefits for knowledge building and sharing?
-
-
22 May 08
-
07 Jan 08
Neli Maria MengalliThe most popular visualization of RDF - the underlying language to represent the Semantic Web ? is a Big Fat Graph (BFG). By graph, we mean representations with nodes and edges to model the relationships within the space represented. Take a look at any o
-
04 Jan 08
Jeff GiddensThe most popular visualization of RDF - the underlying language to represent the Semantic Web ? is a Big Fat Graph (BFG). By graph, we mean representations with nodes and edges to model the relationships within the space represented. Take a look at any of
-
06 Aug 07
-
09 May 07
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.