This link has been bookmarked by 143 people . It was first bookmarked on 26 Jul 2007, by Chris Duke.
-
26 Apr 16
-
27 Aug 14
J M
'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy
Daniel J. Solove
George Washington University Law School
San Diego Law Review, Vol. 44, p. 745, 2007
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 289
Abstract:
In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28
Keywords: privacy, nothing to hide, data mining, surveillance
JEL Classification: C80, D80 -
10 Jan 14
-
18 Sep 13
-
16 Sep 13
Felipe Lavín"In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings."
-
02 Jul 13
J NIn this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.
-
16 Oct 12
-
14 Oct 12
Tom BurzynskiDaniel J. Solove's paper about the "I've Got Nothing to Hide" argument of privacy.
-
20 Aug 12
-
26 Jun 12
-
30 Jan 12
-
12 Nov 11
-
08 Jun 11
-
Niklas VainioIn this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.
-
26 Feb 11
김홍식국가권력과 개인정보보호에 관한 다니엘 솔로브의 명논문 http://bit.ly/emKLMJ - we have nothing to hide.
-
05 Feb 11
-
05 Jan 11
Edison MoraisIndicação de Silvio Meira:
todo mundo tem muito a esconder. a privacidade é um dos princípios essenciais da vida e um dos direitos humanos fundamentais. daniel solove, da george washington university law school, escreveu um paper precioso sobre o assunto ['I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy], onde o argumento "nada a esconder" é desmontado passo a passo. o artigo está em primeiro lugar na lista de downloads da SSRN [rede de pesquisa em ciências sociais] -
12 Nov 10
-
01 Jun 10
-
17 May 10
-
11 Feb 10
-
10 Jan 10
-
08 Jan 10
-
04 Jan 10
-
01 Jan 10
Scott HotesSSRN-'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy by Daniel Solove
-
18 Dec 09
josh rehmanA rebuttal of the ever-popular "only people with something to hide require privacy" argument.
-
17 Dec 09
-
16 Dec 09
Mohit JustIn this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide.
-
15 Dec 09
-
10 Dec 09
-
12 Sep 09
Andreas Kienle»When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which ca
-
25 Aug 09
-
14 Aug 09
-
14 Jun 09
-
05 May 09
-
27 Mar 09
-
18 Mar 09
-
09 Mar 09
-
10 Jan 09
José Canelas"In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide
articles privacy discussion security politics surveillance law
-
09 Jan 09
Michel Bauwens"In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide
-
30 Dec 08
Karl WabstIn this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.
-
03 Dec 08
-
01 Nov 08
-
09 Oct 08
-
03 Sep 08
-
14 Aug 08
-
09 Jul 08
-
19 Jun 08
-
18 Jun 08
-
17 May 08
-
15 Apr 08
-
04 Mar 08
-
26 Feb 08
-
25 Feb 08
-
18 Feb 08
-
13 Feb 08
-
28 Jan 08
-
24 Sep 07
-
14 Sep 07
Nathan ReinHaven't read this yet, but it looks interesting. Addresses the common, dismissive response to concerns about privacy and the law by people who say, "I've got nothing to hide, so why should I care?" and explains why this misrepresents the nature and import
!toread del.icio.us_import law post:tumblr privacy research via:trailfire
-
12 Aug 07
-
08 Aug 07
-
22 Jul 07
Chris DukeProfessor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: I've got nothing to hide. The nothing to hide argument quite prevalent. Solove critiques the argumen
-
20 Jul 07
-
18 Jul 07
-
17 Jul 07
Damien RedsingThe "nothing to hide argument" and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.
-
16 Jul 07
-
brockmoellerAccording to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private.
-
13 Jul 07
-
11 Jul 07
-
-
Professor Daniel Solove examines the "nothing to hide" argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the "nothing to hide" argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The "nothing to hide" argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the "nothing to hide" argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.
-
-
Matthew WeymarProf Daniel Solove re "nothing to hide" argument. Many people respond re govt surveillance & data mining: "I've got nothing to hide." I.e., no threat to privacy unless govt uncovers unlawful activity, in which case no legitimate justification to privacy.
SSRN Privacy Daniel Solove DanielSolove article debate editorial essay freedom identity law logic security politics surveillance government paper legal San Diego SanDiego Review lawreview symposium data mining datamining
-
Richard SmithOh, how I wish I had had this article every time someone trotted out the nothing to hide argument. Thank goodness Solove has done this; a service to the world, really. Should be required reading for CMNS 428
-
10 Jul 07
-
Karl JonssonIn this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the "nothing to hide" argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hid
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.