Library clips :: Are you really doing Enterprise 2.0? :: - The Diigo Meta page

• 14 Jan 09
  

  Driessen Samuel

  enterprise2.0

• 16 Dec 08
  

  R Fahey

  e2.0 implementation knowledge km2.0

• 15 Nov 08
  

  Bertrand Duperrin

  James offers various ways or choices in implementing Intranet 2.0 into your organisation.
  
  1. Tactical Social Computing
  2. Enterprise Web 2.0
  3. Enterprise 2.0

  enterprise2.0 implementation web2.0 organization strategy

  • Tactical Social Computing

    
    

    This isn’t really Intranet 2.0, it’s more about a team here and there using social tools like blogs and wikis to get their work done. eg. using a wiki in a call centre to list workarounds and contexts that aren’t covered in procedures, using a blog rather than email to communicate and announce to the team, etc…

  • Enterprise Web 2.0

    
    

    This is more focused on Web 2.0 oriented architecture and Web application frameworks (AJAX, XML, AIR, ATOM, RSS) rather than the social aspects such as blogs and wikis. From the article:

  • 1 more annotations...

  • • Enterprise 2.0

      
      

      From James Dellow’s article:

      
      

      “…an Enterprise 2.0 strategy is something quite different from either the tactical use of social computing or the narrow adoption of Web 2.0 technologies - it is both a technology and business change, where social computing tools help flatten and also reflect the flatness of organisations.”

• 14 Nov 08
  

  Richard Fahey
  • When we talk about enterprise 2.0 we often also mean the culture, adoption and human part of it, we assume a new style of bottom-up work. The last thing we want to do is stifle the potential of the tools with a top-down approach. I think KM 2.0 comes in to make sure enterprise 2.0 is left alone and emergence can happen, but then comes in to guide and facilitate, to make sure it’s adaptive in the best possible way.
• 

  Xavier Bartholome

  There's a nice little list of KSF's for the implementation of E2.0

  enterprise 2.0 implementation

  • Network Effects - without a critical mass of participators, contributors, and collectors (and tagging, linking, voting) we cannot have emergence
  • Participation - we need bloggers, commentors, editors, taggers, etc…
  • 3 more annotations...
  • • Self Interest - we have more chance of Participation if our motivation is self interest and connection, and easier ways to do our work.
    • Ease of Use - we have more chance of Participation if the tools are easy to use and unstructured so we can bend them to our needs
    • Transparency/Support/Bottom-up - management need to govern rather than manage, they need to lax control and take a facilitative and leadership approach.

Would you like to comment?

Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.