This link has been bookmarked by 2 people . It was first bookmarked on 09 Mar 2008, by Marie Coleman.
-
21 Mar 09
-
09 Mar 08
-
Textbooks may be the most predominant instructional tool in America
-
Although research suggests that textbook organization affects reading comprehension, evaluations of textbooks have found many to be poorly written. Poorly written textbooks may play a part in the comprehension difficulties of poor readers, especially those who have difficulty recalling content, organizing information, identifying main ideas, and discriminating between relevant and nonrelevant information.
-
In these contexts, students have demonstrated varying reading comprehension difficulties, whether the text was a story, social studies chapter, science experiment, or mathematics word problem.
-
students with diverse learning needs
-
provided evidence that the organization of text, students' awareness of that organization, and students' strategic use of text organization affect their comprehension.
-
organization of text includes the visual, physical organization (e.g., headings, subheadings, location of main idea, spacing) as well as less visible, more abstract text structures (e.g., narrative, sequence, or descriptive text structures) (see Figure 3). The three general areas of convergent evidence from this literature review are:
Well-presented physical text facilitates reading comprehension.
Text structure and student awareness of text structure are highly related to reading comprehension.
Explicit instruction in the physical presentation of text and/or text structure facilitates reading comprehension.
-
Well-Presented Physical Text Facilitates Reading Comprehension
-
enables readers to identify the relevant information in text, including main ideas and relations between ideas, skills that are central to comprehension
-
visual cues
-
clearly indicate the main idea, the relations between important information, and the thought units within a sentence.
-
focus readers' attention on the global, macrostructure of a text, while the indicators of thought units within sentences focus readers' attention on phrases rather than letters and words.
-
ability to comprehend main ideas differentiates good and poor readers and is directly related to general comprehension ability
-
summarizing, and outlining
-
Yet, main idea statements often do not appear as the first sentence in a paragraph or are omitted from content area textbooks
-
clarity and coherence with which main ideas are presented in text has been found to facilitate their identification
-
ordering topics systematically
-
stating a good topic organization in the opening paragraph
-
placing the topic sentence of a paragraph at the beginning of a paragraph rather than embedding or inferring it
-
arranging supporting details in recognizable patterns that exemplify superordinate/ subordinate relations
-
ability to form relations between important information in text.
-
semantic and syntactic cues. Semantic cues include topic sentences to signal text organization
-
). Syntactic cues include noncontent signal words such as "first," "second," and "finally" to indicate sequential organization
-
Headings and subheadings are additional cues
-
the effect of "chunking," or using spaces to divide information in sentences into meaningful thought units or phrases (e.g., noun phrases, verb phrases). Chunking information allows "perception and recall of idea units rather than letters or single words"
-
chunked text benefited low performers and was not a detriment for high performers. While it may be difficult for teachers to chunk material in textbooks, Casteel suggested having students chunk verb, noun, and object phrases by placing vertical lines between the chunks or underlining chunks prior to reading.
-
Strategic Use of Well-Presented Text
-
Summarizing, integrating information, and forming relations between important information are important reading comprehension skills. Fluent readers use textual cues to identify important information to include in summaries
-
However, when the main idea is implicit rather than clearly presented, normally achieving students have demonstrated difficulty identifying main ideas and integrating information
-
Chunked text appears to neither benefit nor hinder high-ability readers
-
when students with LD have comprehension difficulties, teachers need to consider whether the students are able to identify the important information in a reading passage. Therefore, they may need explicit training to increase sensitivity to important text information.
-
Text that clearly signals main ideas and relations between ideas facilitates comprehension. Techniques for clearly presenting text include (a) ordering topics systematically; (b) stating topic organization in the opening paragraph; (c) placing topic sentences at the beginning of paragraphs; (d) arranging supporting details in recognizable patterns that exemplify superordinate/subordinate relations; (e) using precise language to make clear the relations between concepts, ideas, and sentences; (f) using signal words such as "first," "second," and "finally;" and (g) using headings, subheadings, and topic sentences to cue the interrelations between important ideas.
-
ext structure appears to play an important role in reading comprehension. Moreover, there is strong empirical evidence that readers' awareness of text structure is highly related to reading comprehension.
-
Area of Convergence # 2: Text Structure and Student Awareness of Text Structure are Highly Related to Reading Comprehension
-
common expository texts include persuasion, explanation, comparison/contrast, enumeration or collection, problem-solution, and description, designed primarily to inform the reader
-
two types of text: narrative and expository. Narrative is more common than expository text and is usually a story written to entertain the reader
-
narrative text depicts events, actions, emotions, or situations that people in a culture experience
-
normally involve (a) animate beings as characters with goals and motives; (b) temporal and spatial placements usually presented at the beginning of the story; (c) a problem or goal faced by the main character that imitates a major goal; (d) plots or a series of episodes that eventually resolve the complication; (e) impacts upon the reader's emotions and arousal levels; and (f) points (e.g., justice, honesty, loyalty), morals, or themes
-
tory grammar refers to "abstract linguistic representation of the idea, events, and personal motivations that comprise the flow of a story"
-
story grammar components and their hierarchical relations represent frames or patterns that readers can use to store information in long-term memory.
-
generate predictions about patterns of passage recall, passage summarization, importance ratings of statement, passage statement clusters, and reading time, but there has been controversy over whether story grammars or other representations of knowledge (e.g., knowledge about planning, social action, motives) can explain these predictions
-
While narrative text structure primarily entertains, expository text primarily communicates information
-
Textbooks, essays, and most magazine articles are examples of expository text
-
While narrative text structures has largely focused on story grammars, research on expository text has spanned a much broader range of organizational patterns. Common expository text structures include compare/contrast, classification, illustration, procedural description
-
sequence, enumeration or collection, problem-solution, and description
-
well-structured expository text facilitates comprehension of main ideas or topics, rather than facts.
-
narrative appearing easier to comprehend and monitor than expository text.
-
text type affected recall and comprehension monitoring. Students recalled significantly more idea units from narrative than expository passages. When comparing texts with inconsistencies to texts without inconsistencies, students looked back more frequently for inconsistent narrative than inconsistent expository text, suggesting that inconsistencies were more apparent in narrative than in expository text. Students were also better able to verbally report on passage consistency after reading narrative than expository passages. Students reread expository passages more frequently than narrative passages when the passages did not contain inconsistent information, indicating that students found expository text more problematic than narrative text. Additionally, students reread more frequently when inconsistent text was adjacent to the correct sentence than when it was far from the correct sentence.
-
learners "familiar" with text structure who read well-structured, clearly cued text performed better on measures of global comprehension (e.g., main topics) than students who did not demonstrate familiarity with test structure.
-
Student awareness of structural patterns in expository writing (e.g., sequence, causation, comparison/contrast) facilitated recall of not only more text information, but more theses or main ideas
-
strong research support that students have a greater awareness of narrative than expository text structures
-
and that students remember and comprehend narrative text structure easier than they do expository text structure
-
First, narrative content is more familiar to students than expository content.
-
Second, this familiar content of narrative includes event sequences (e.g., intentional acts in pursuit of goals; events that occur in the material world). Event sequences are the core content of children and adults' experience in everyday life.
-
Third, narrative structure is prevalent in oral language
-
Normally achieving students appear more facile with both narrative and expository text structures than diverse learners. One indicator of facility with text is the number of times readers look back at text to correct comprehension failures. Good readers had significantly more look-backs than poor readers for difficult (i.e., expository) text and significantly more look-backs for expository than narrative passages. Good readers also had more look-backs for inconsistent text than poor readers, though the differences were not significant. Good readers correctly reported significantly more inconsistencies than poor readers
-
The evidence is clear that text structure and students' awareness of text structure are positively related to reading comprehension. Student sensitivity to text structure may be developmental and varies according to text structure type. Generally, narrative is easier than expository text for students and some types of expository text are easier than others (e.g., sequence was found to be easier than enumeration and description, which in turn was found to be easier than compare/contrast)
-
Teachers should be aware of these variations and may want to attend more carefully to text structure as students move to reading more expository text in the upper-elementary school grades. Zabrucky and Ratner (1992) posed that teachers be concerned with increasing students' awareness of different text structures and informing students of the impact of these structures on evaluation, regulation, and memory. Students should be taught to adjust their reading and rereading skills and to assess their readiness for recall when text information varies in difficulty. This instruction may be more effective if it occurs for narrative before expository text.
-
Area of Convergence # 3: Explicit Instruction in Text Organization
-
What to Teach
-
xplicit, task-specific instruction on (a) how to recognize the physical presentation of important information in text, including topic sentences and where these usually occur in well-organized paragraphs; and (b) headings and subheadings and their purposes.
-
two additional structural cues to teach students: the patterns that exemplify subordinate and superordinate relations; and signal words (e.g., "first," "finally").
-
teaching students a summarizing strategy using the headings, subheadings, and paragraph topics of textbooks resulted in more recalled text information than answering questions or studying.
-
Approaches to text structure instruction included both systematic attention to clues that signal how authors relate ideas to one another and systematic attempts to impose structure upon text.
-
suggested that teachers be concerned not only with increasing students' awareness of different text structures, but also with informing students of the impact text structures have on evaluation, regulation, and memory. They suggested generalizing metacognitive skills to more difficult expository passages after training with narrative passages.
-
teaching students to study or create visual representations of key ideas in text (e.g., networking, flowcharting, Con Struct, mapping, conceptual frames, graphic organizers, conceptual mapping) benefited reading comprehension.
-
Graphic organizer instruction consisted of reading and rereading for 15 minutes, and completing and studying graphic organizers for 20 minutes.
-
graphic organizers helped make mainstreaming a valid instructional delivery system for all students.
-
major contribution of research has been to transform reading skills (e.g., summarize, identify main ideas, identify relations between main ideas) into explicit strategies that students can be taught directly
-
includes teaching students how to use (a) the physical presentation of text (e.g., location of topic sentences, headings, subheadings, signal words) as a strategy to identify main ideas and form interrelations between concepts, main ideas, and supporting details (Seidenberg, 1989); (b) a story grammar to identify the important ideas in narrative text (Gurney et al., 1990; Newby et al., 1989); and (c) expository text structures > to identify concepts and interrelations or to impose interrelations upon poorly written text. Examples of imposing text structure include visual representations of text (Horton et al., 1990; Pearson & Fielding, 1991) and note sheets organized around text structure (Englert & Thomas, 1987). Strategy instruction holds particular promise for students with LD as they seem to lack the ability to engage in strategic activities and do not spontaneously access and use cognitive strategies when these are needed
-
Expository text structures
-
Strategies to identify the main idea in text appear particularly important.
-
strong support for explicit and direct instruction in text presentation and text structure.
-
cited studies that used either a model-lead-test or model-guided practice-independent practice format.
-
followed a general pattern of (a) explaining the skill or component of text structure; (b) telling the importance; (c) modeling how, when, and where to use the skill, and how to evaluate the effectiveness of the skill; (d) providing guided and independent practice; (e) teaching for transfer; and (f) evaluating.
-
Caveats for Instruction
-
The first two areas are three-pronged, involving (a) presentation and structure of text, (b) students' awareness of text presentation and structure, and (c) students' strategic use of text presentation and structure. Text presentation facilitates reading comprehension if (a) main ideas are clearly stated and located at the beginnings of paragraphs; and (b) the relations between important information are clearly indicated by headings, subheadings, signal words, and sentences or paragraphs signaling text organization placed at the beginning of the passage. Extra spacing between thought units in sentences facilitates attention to ideas within sentences. Text structure facilitates reading comprehension, with narrative text structure being generally easier for students to recall and monitor than expository text structures.
However, it may be that simply presenting text in a clear, well-organized manner is not sufficient. Research suggests that students' awareness of that presentation and strategic use of text are also needed to enable students to identify relevant and nonrelevant information, main ideas, and relations between ideas. Normally achieving students appear to strategically use text organization to identify main ideas and relations between ideas. However, if main ideas are not clearly stated, even normally achieving students have demonstrated difficulty identifying important information, summarizing, and integrating information.
Unlike normally achieving students, diverse learners appear less aware of text organization and its use as a strategy. Many comprehension difficulties of diverse learners have been attributed to their deficits in text structure awareness. For example, they have demonstrated difficulty identifying main ideas, and discriminating between relevant and nonrelevant information. While demonstrating a knowledge of strategies, they fail to demonstrate a use of strategies.
The first two convergent areas and the importance of students' awareness and strategic use of text presentation lead to the third convergent area -- explicit instruction in text organization facilitates comprehension. Research supports instruction in the physical presentation of text, text structures, and strategic use of text organization to benefit reading comprehension. Research evidence also supports explicit instruction that follows a general pattern of (a) explaining the skill or component of text structure; (b) telling the importance; (c) modeling how, when, and where to use the skill, and how to evaluate the effectiveness of the skill; (d) providing guided and independent practice; (e) teaching for transfer; and (f) evaluating.
The effect on reading comprehension of the presentation and structure of text is more global than local. Well-presented and structured text results in better comprehension of main ideas and relations between ideas than poorly presented or structured text. Likewise, students who are aware of or have had instruction in the physical presentation of text or text structure demonstrate more global comprehension than students who lack awareness or have not had instruction. Although students who are aware of text structure recall more than students who are not aware of text structure, there is often no difference between these students for local (i.e., details) comprehension.
-
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.