Official Google Webmaster Central Blog: Dynamic URLs vs. static URLs

Hua Li's personal annotations on this page

Huaxlee bookmarked on 2008-10-08 SEO URL

Google 的意思是不是说，有些网站的重写规则太糟糕了，比如discuz论坛，会跟google-bot带来很多困扰，反而会造成重复页面等负面影响？

However, if you're using URL rewriting (rather than making a copy of the content) to produce static-looking URLs from a dynamic site, you could be doing harm rather than good.
- Huaxlee on 2008-10-08
  
  怀疑
I think this is a ridiculous article coming from you guys! To say we shouldn't rewrite URLs because we may rewrite irresponsibly.
While you may be able to create high-quality URLs like that, the average webmaster often is not able to do so. We see too many examples of webmasters shooting themselves in the foot by installing some so-called "SEF/SEO-Module" on their site, which makes algorithimcally understanding a website close to impossible. If we are to give a general recommendation, we would have to say that it is better to stick with dynamic URLs.
This post clarifies that rewriting URLs *can* cause problems for Google, which is completely true. This is useful information for developers who might be writing applications full of dynamic-to-static rewriting.

This link has been bookmarked by 20 people . It was first bookmarked on 23 Sep 2008, by ccc mann.

07 Oct 09

Terri Karp
seo urls google
21 Sep 09

Bernhard S
Sonstige_Projekte Index-lokal jQuey-Forum jQuery jQuery-Adobe-Flash-Player jQuery-Rating jQuery-href Text jQuery-Mail jQuery-Anfang JS-Framwork Vergleich Google-Analityc Google-SEO Banner-Server Verwaltung OpenX_API Forum-Disk
16 Mar 09

Johnny Starr
google
01 Dec 08

urls static dynamic rewriting optimization seo crawling
16 Oct 08

Scott Moody
google url seo gotcha routing optimizing
08 Oct 08

Hua Li
Google 的意思是不是说，有些网站的重写规则太糟糕了，比如discuz论坛，会跟google-bot带来很多困扰，反而会造成重复页面等负面影响？

SEO URL
- However, if you're using URL rewriting (rather than making a copy of the content) to produce static-looking URLs from a dynamic site, you could be doing harm rather than good.
  - Hua Li on 2008-10-08
    
    怀疑
- I think this is a ridiculous article coming from you guys! To say we shouldn't rewrite URLs because we may rewrite irresponsibly.
- 2 more annotations...
- - While you may be able to create high-quality URLs like that, the average webmaster often is not able to do so. We see too many examples of webmasters shooting themselves in the foot by installing some so-called "SEF/SEO-Module" on their site, which makes algorithimcally understanding a website close to impossible. If we are to give a general recommendation, we would have to say that it is better to stick with dynamic URLs.
  - This post clarifies that rewriting URLs *can* cause problems for Google, which is completely true. This is useful information for developers who might be writing applications full of dynamic-to-static rewriting.
29 Sep 08

Philip Guth
urls seo google jlearning
25 Sep 08

David Lazar
Official Google Webmaster Central Blog:

BrowserRank SEO Blogs Google.com
24 Sep 08

lievenvdv
David Murray
The conversation that takes place in the comments is why I tagged this article. From the site - Chatting with webmasters often reveals widespread beliefs that might have been accurate in the past, but are not necessarily up-to-date any more. This was the

webdesign search blogs comparison webmaster
jingo74
dynamic-websites archiving
Tristan Rivoallan
Eapen G
webmaster webdesign web urls vs google
23 Sep 08

Jayanta Mondal
seo urls google important reading read
uhlandfriends -
Google über dynamische und statische URLs.

seo google suchmaschinenoptimierung online-marketing
ccc mann
google dynamic static urls seo