2,200 years before Frazer said the same thing!
This link has been bookmarked by 2 people . It was first bookmarked on 29 Aug 2006, by Mike Wesch.
-
03 Nov 06
-
29 Aug 06
-
Add Sticky Noteit was
recorded that these gods were originally great kings
of remote antiquity who had subsequently been deified. -
-
To him mythology was “a dis-
ease of language.” He believed that the various names
for God could be traced back to a common origin in
human speech. -
According to Müller, the first form of religion was
henotheism or cathenotheism, which signified a vague
conception of deity that found expression in the
attribution of divine qualities to whatever manifesta-
tion of power an individual happened to be concerned
with on a particular occasion. -
Müller greatly pro-
moted the comparative study of religion, especially by
his initiating of the celebrated series of translations
entitled The Sacred Books of the East. The origin of
religion he traced to the mind of man:No doubt there existed in the human mind, from the very
beginning, something, whether we call it a suspicion, an
innate idea, an intuition, or a sense of the Divine. What
distinguishes man from the rest of the animal creation is
chiefly that ineradicable feeling of dependence and reliance
upon some higher power, a consciousness of bondage from
which the very name of “religion” was derived (Chips from
a German Workshop, 2 vols., London [1867], I, 239). -
Charles-
François Dupuis in his Origine de tous les cultes (1795).
He maintained that Christ, Osiris, Bacchus, and Mithra
were only allegorical personifications of the sun and
its annual career. -
Maritime exploration,
and the trade and colonization which resulted from
it, brought contact with the great civilizations of Asia
and their religions, together with knowledge of the
primitive peoples of Africa, Australasia, and the
Americas. All this new information gradually stirred
the minds of educated men in Europe, making them
aware of the diversity and complexity of the cultures
of mankind, many of them far older than that of Chris-
tian Europe and of equal achievement in many things. -
Christian thinkers had
been obliged to find answers to pagan criticism of their
faith. One of their chief points of concern was the
newness of Christianity compared with the great
antiquity of the pagan cults. This objection was met
by the formulation in the third and fourth centuries
of a philosophy of history, to which Julius Africanus,
Eusebius of Caesarea, and Augustine of Hippo made
the most notable contributions. By taking over the
Hebrew scriptures as their own legitimate heritage,
Christians were able to show to their own satisfaction
that their religion could be traced back to the very
Creation. This philosophy of history, together with
their exclusive soteriology, provided medieval Chris-
tians with a completely adequate account of the origin
of religion, since for them there was only one true
religion, and that was their own. -
Lucretius in
his De rerum natura taught that men had dreamed of
gods, to whom they attributed omnipotence and
immortality. Unable to account for natural phenomena,
especially in its more terrifying aspects, men had gone
on to ascribe all such things to the gods, whom they
consequently feared and sought to propitiate. Lucretius
did not deny the existence of gods, but he held that
they had no contact at all with the world and mankind. -
about 450 B.C., Anaxagoras shocked con-
servative opinion in Athens by declaring that the sun
and moon were red-hot stones, which meant that they
could not be divinities. -
Xenophanes (sixth century B.C.). As
the following fragments disclose, Xenophanes had
perceived the ethnic relativity of the personification
of deity, as well as its innate anthropomorphism:Mortals think that the gods are born, and wear clothes like
their own, and have a voice and bodies. -
Rudolf Otto (1869-1937), a German philosopher of
religion, in his widely influential book Das Heilige
(1917), which was translated into English as The Idea
of the Holy (1923). Otto was concerned to emphasize
the nonrational nature of religious experience. -
Among Freud's followers, the most distin-
guished was C. J. Jung (1875-1961), who developed
his own distinctive interpretation of man's mental and
emotional life. Jung defined religion asa peculiar attitude of mind which could be formulated in
accordance with the original use of the word “religio,”
which means a careful consideration and observation of
certain dynamic factors, that are conceived as “powers”;
spirits, demons, gods, laws, ideals, or whatever name man
has given to such factors in his world as he has found
powerful, dangerous, or helpful enough to be taken into
careful consideration, or grand, beautiful, and meaningful
enough to be devoutly worshipped and loved (Jung, p. 8). -
In his Totem and Taboo (1918), Freud
propounded his thesis that “the beginnings of religion,
ethics, society, and art meet in the Oedipus complex.”
He imagined a primordial state of human society
composed of a “primitive horde,” dominated by a
father who kept all females for himself and repelled
his growing sons. The latter banded together to slay
their father, whom they both hated and admired. They
ate their victim, to identify themselves with him and
absorb his strength. After their parricide, remorse set
in and a sense of guilt formed. Rituals of expiation were
devised, centered on the totem as the “father substi-
tute.” -
earch now began to be made in other directions,
most notably in human psychology or in some supposed
precognitive stage in human development. -
The drawing of attention to the communal factor
in primitive religion was an understandable reaction
to the hitherto prevailing disposition to contemplate
the origin of religion in terms of individual ratiocina-
tion. -
Émile Durkheim (1858-1917), preeminent among
French sociologists, saw in the institution of totemism,
then a popular topic of concern among anthropologists,
a concept of basic significance for understanding the
social origins of religion. He wrote accordingly:The god of the clan, the totemic principle, can therefore
be nothing else than the clan itself, personified and repre-
sented to the imagination under the visible form of the
animal or vegetable which serves as totem (Elementary
Forms of the Religious Life [1915], p. 206). -
he consequently
saw both polytheism and polygamy as degenerate
forms of the earlier faith and practice. Although this
interpretation was so obviously congenial to Christian
theology, Schmidt did not however posit an original
divine revelation for his primeval monotheism. -
Andrew Lang (1844-1912), stressing the fact
that many “primitive” peoples believed in a supreme
creator-deity, a “High God” or “All-Father,” argued
that monotheism was the earliest form of religion and
that animism represented a degeneration from this
original conception. This idea of a primeval
monotheism found its most devoted exponent in Father
Wilhelm Schmidt (1868-1954), who maintained his
case in a twelve-volume work, Der Ursprung der
Gottesidee (1926-55). -
Another notable contribution made by Frazer to the
study of religious origins was his exposition of the
economic factor in the evolution of religious ideas and
practices. He showed that man, as an agriculturalist,
became profoundly concerned with the annual life-
cycle of vegetation upon which his food supply
depended—with the drama implicit in the burying of
the seed-corn in the earth, its germination, the upward
surge of its new life in spring, its cutting down at
harvest and transformation into food. It was from man's
personification of the principle of vegetation, accord-
ing to Frazer, that the idea of a god who dies and
rises again originated, finding expression in such
celebrated deities as Attis, Adonis, Osiris, and Christ. -
as
follows:It becomes probable that magic arose before religion in the
evolution of our race, and that man essayed to bend nature
to his wishes by the sheer force of spells and enchantments
before he strove to coax and mollify a coy, capricious, or
irascible deity by the soft insinuation of prayer and sacrifice
(op. cit., I, 234). -
Frazer regarded religion as representing the
second stage in the evolution of man's relations with
the superior powers of the natural world. The first stage
he designated the Age of Magic, unknowingly devel-
oping an idea of Hegel's. -
James George Frazer (1854-1941). His output of
important works was prodigious. His magnum opus
entitled The Golden Bough comprises twelve volumes,
an index and bibliographical volume, and a volume
called Aftermath. The influence which he has had on
modern thinking about religion has been very great;
although many of his interpretations are now out-
moded, his works remain a treasury of information
about the religious customs and beliefs of mankind. In
The Golden Bough (The Magic Art, 3rd. ed., I, 222)
he set forth his definition of religion as being “a
propitiation or conciliation of powers superior to man
which are believed to direct and control the course
of nature and of human life.” He held that man's
knowledge of God was inferential, being derived “ei-
ther by meditating on the operations of his own mind,
or by observing the processes of external nature... -
Marett sought for an even earlier and
more primitive stage, such as was indicated by the idea
of mana, i.e., an impersonal supernatural power
envisaged by certain savage peoples, with which con-
temporary anthropologists had become much con-
cerned. According to Marett,The question is whether apart from ideas of spirit, ghost,
soul, and the like, and before such ideas have become
the dominant factors in the constituent experience, a
rudimentary religion can exist. It will suffice to prove that
supernaturalism, the attitude of the mind dictated by awe
of the mysterious, which provides religion with its raw
material, may exist apart from animism, and, further, may
provide a basis on which animistic doctrine is subsequently
constructed (The Threshold of Religion, 1914).To define this pre-personalized stage in the evolution
of religion, Marett invented the term “Animatism.” -
Tylor explained how the idea of an anima first
came to be formed:It seems as though thinking men, as yet at a low level of
culture, were deeply impressed by two groups of biological
problems. In the first place, what is it that makes the
difference between a living body and a dead one; what
causes waking, sleep, trance, disease, death? In the second
place, what are these human shapes which appear in dreams
and visions? Looking at these two groups of phenomena,
the ancient savage philosophers probably made their first
step by the obvious inference that every man has two things
belonging to him, namely, a life and a phantom. These two
are evidently in close connexion with the body, the life as
enabling it to feel and think and act, the phantom as being
its image or second self; both, also, are perceived to be
things separable from the body, the life as being able to
go away and leave it insensible or dead, the phantom as
appearing to people at a distance from it (Primitive Culture,
I, 428).From this initial concept of an animating principle
within man, according to Tylor, religion derived.
-
Public Stiky Notes
Page Comments
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.