NOTE the research by NYU and the following testimony from Georgetown.
Then NOTE the opposing viewpoint, from McCain's campaign chairman in Wisconsin.
Which parties seem more credible?
This link has been bookmarked by 1 people . It was first bookmarked on 26 Oct 2008, by Clay Burell.
-
26 Oct 08
Clay BurellWonderful to see GOP-heavy Supreme Court show non-partisanship with these decisions.
Not surprising to see George W. Bush disagree with them.
The entire article is worth a read. Annotated link http://www.diigo.com/bookmark/http%3A%2F%2Fdyn.politico.co-
Add Sticky NoteThe battles are over a section of the Help American Vote Act, passed in 2002 by Congress to prevent another Florida-style recount. HAVA requires states to match information supplied on voter registration forms with department of motor vehicles and Social Security records.
Individuals who provide information that does not match those documents may face confusion at the polls or be required to vote on a provisional ballot.
But critics of the provision say inaccurate state databases lead to erroneous disqualifications. A study by the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law found that the matching process fails 20 percent to 30 percent of the time due to minor errors like database typos, use of nicknames, and multiple entries.
“The general narrative of what’s going on with a lot of these cases is to attempt to limit the voters to who are participating,” said Georgetown law professor Jonah Goldman, director of the nonpartisan National Campaign for Fair Elections. “The central premise is that more voters help Democrats.”
Republicans, however, say that the databases are a way to increase security at the polls and stop illegal registrations from becoming fraudulent voters.
“Make no mistake, HAVA disenfranchises no one and protects the right to vote,” said Wisconsin Republican State Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen, state chairman of McCain’s campaign. “HAVA checks are an important safeguard — one mandated by Congress and state law — to help make sure those lawful votes are not diluted by unlawful votes.” -
-
At the beginning of October, ACORN reported that it registered 1.3 million new voters. But further investigation found that 30 percent — roughly 400,000 registrations — were faulty in some way, either registered under fake names such Mickey Mouse, were duplicates or were incomplete. Republicans jumped on the findings, arguing that the group was proof of a systemic voter fraud campaign by the left.
-
Add Sticky NoteBut faulty registrations rarely turn into illegal votes. While ACORN has admitted to errors in its registration process, documented cases of illegally cast ballots remain rare. A five-year investigation by the Bush administration resulted in the convictions of only 26 voters found guilty of voting more than once, registration fraud, or ineligible voting.
-
In other words, the faulty registrations at ACORN result in ACORN losing money paid to the dishonest employees. They do NOT result in illegal votes.
Read it: Bush commissioned the study that confirms this.
-
-
“This is not a plan that was hatched yesterday,” said Daniel Tokaji, an election law specialist at Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. “The Republican party is using the whole ACORN rap as a justification for the stringent ballot security measures they are urging.”
-
Add Sticky NoteWisconsin election officials admit that their database incorrectly flags voters at least 20 percent of the time. When the six members of the state elections board, all retired judges, ran their own registrations through the system, four were incorrectly rejected.
-
HILARIOUS.
-
-
Add Sticky NoteIn Michigan, the Democratic National Committee and the Obama campaign sued the Michigan and Macomb County Republican parties after learning of an alleged Republican plan to use foreclosure filings to keep some residents who've failed to update their address from voting. The suit settled last week and the information will not be used.
-
The cynicism of this one is only matched by its heartlessness. The Michigan GOP wanted to DISENFRANCHISE JOE THE PLUMBERS WHO'D LOST THEIR HOMES DUE TO THE ECONOMIC MELTDOWN.
We don't want THEM voting, do we?
-
-
Public Stiky Notes
Then NOTE the opposing viewpoint, from McCain's campaign chairman in Wisconsin.
Which parties seem more credible?
Read it: Bush commissioned the study that confirms this.
We don't want THEM voting, do we?
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.