Skip to main content

Diigo Home

Obama's Seven Lessons for Radical Innovators - Umair Haque - The Diigo Meta page

discussionleader.hbsp.com/...s_seven_lessons_for_radic.html - Cached

This link has been bookmarked by 24 people . It was first bookmarked on 05 Nov 2008, by W W.

  • 05 Mar 09
  • 12 Jan 09
  • 13 Dec 08
  • 17 Nov 08
    dcsdweb
    Mark Blair

    How did Obama utilize radically asymmetrical competition to shatter Washington's toxic, bitter 20th century status quo?

    The most critical part of the story is the organization Obama built. Though conservatives are still arguing that Obama has little executive experience, nothing could be further from the truth.

    leadership working smarter

  • 10 Nov 08
    lampertina
    Yule Heibel

    As usual, a brilliant essay by Umair Haque on Obama's win and what business can learn from it in terms of innovation.
    QUOTE
    Barack Obama is one of the most radical management innovators in the world today. Obama's team built something truly world-changing: a new kind of political organization for the 21st century. It differs from yesterday's political organizations as much as Google and Threadless differ from yesterday's corporations: all are a tiny handful of truly new, 21st century institutions in the world today.

    Obama presidential bid succeeded, in other words, as our research at the Lab has discussed for the past several years, through the power of new DNA: new rules for new kinds of institutions.
    UNQUOTE

    obama umair umair_haque management innovation business_model

    • 1. Have a self-organization design. What was really different about Obama's organization? We're used to thinking about organizations in 20th century terms: do we design them to be tall, or flat?


      But tall and flat are concepts built for an industrial era. They force us to think - spatially and literally - in two dimensions: tall organizations command unresponsively, and flat organizations respond uncontrollably.


      Obama's organization blew past these orthodoxies: it was able to combine the virtues of both tall and flat organizations. How? By tapping the game-changing power of self-organization. Obama's organization was less tall or flat than spherical - a tightly controlled core, surrounded by self-organizing cells of volunteers, donors, contributors, and other participants at the fuzzy edges.

    • 2. Seek elasticity of resilience.
    • 10 more annotations...
  • 09 Nov 08
  • 07 Nov 08
    mbauwens
    Michel Bauwens

    The most critical part of the story is the organization Obama built. Though conservatives are still arguing that Obama has little executive experience, nothing could be further from the truth.

    P2P-Elections P2P

  • 06 Nov 08
    • Where are the ideals in your organization? What ideals are missing - absent, bankrupt, stolen - from your economy, industry, or market? What ideals will you fight and struggle for - and live? Because the ultimate problem with industrial-era business was, as Wall Street has so convincingly demonstrated, this: there weren't any.


      That seventh lesson is the starting point for tomorrow's radical innovators - because it's the thread that knits the others together. And it's where you should start if you want to use these seven rules to start building 21st century institutions - whether businesses, non-profits, social enterprises, or political campaigns.

  • tonzyl
    Ton Zijlstra

    Umair takes some lessons out of Obama's campaign for innovating management

    uselections management strategy innovationstrategy innovation

  • 05 Nov 08
    shackbar
    Sean Hackbarth

    This is business-speak gobble-dee-gook.

  • emmfan
    Emmanuel Fan

    Obama's team built something truly world-changing: a new kind of political organization for the 21st century. It differs from yesterday's political organizations as much as Google and Threadless differ from yesterday's corporations: all are a tiny handful of truly new, 21st century institutions in the world today.

    strategy management hbr

    • Obama's organization was less tall or flat than spherical - a tightly controlled core, surrounded by self-organizing cells of volunteers, donors, contributors, and other participants at the fuzzy edges. The result? Obama's organization was able to reverse tremendous asymmetries in finance, marketing, and distribution - while McCain's organization was left trapped by a stifling command-and-control paradigm.
    • That's resilience: reflexively bouncing back to an existential threat by growing, augmenting, or strengthening resources.
    • 5 more annotations...
    • Have a self-organization design
    • Seek elasticity of resilience.
    • 10 more annotations...