2 Cents Worth » School 2.0 Resists Definition: As it Should - The Diigo Meta page

• 26 Oct 07
  

  Cherice Montgomery

  conversation education future learning philosophy web2.0 21st_century_literacies

• 12 Feb 07
  

  Mike Cullum

  school2.0 teaching education curriculum future learning

• 08 Feb 07
  

  Robyn Jay

  school2.0 education teaching learning schools conversation nswlearnscope nswlearnscope07 fromdelicious

• 07 Feb 07
  

  David Jakes

  post describing school 2.0 in the context of velocity. Interesting read from DWarlick

  school2.0 blogpost

• 

  change

  • Monologs are predictable.  Conversations are not. 
  • School 2.0 must tap into what Greg Suprock called the natural forces of the evolving information environment: The power of users, the strength of collaboration, the energy of groups, and the value of quality — and all of this happens in the dynamic and multidimensional conversations that are increasingly possible in today’s learning environments.
  • I think that monograph and monolog characterize School 1.0, where information is shared, but only in one direction.  Teachers and textbooks speak and illustrate.  Students simply nod their heads, by taking tests.

  1 more annotation...

• 

  Patrick Aroune

  2.0 web

  • School 0 and school 1.0 are schools that are not changing, that are not adapting.  School -1 and School -2 are schools that are going backwards, which, in my opinion, describes U.S. education over the past six years.  School 2.0 is a school that is dynamic, rich with content, equipped with  information tools, and deep with knowledge-building conversations.  School 2.0 adapts!
  • 2.0 as a version number, we might refer to it as a value of velocity
  • Perhaps a certain amount of chaos is exactly what our children need in their learning.
  • It’s why we try to rely so heavily on research, because we strive for predictability.
  • School 2.0 must tap into what Greg Suprock called the natural forces of the evolving information environment: The power of users, the strength of collaboration, the energy of groups, and the value of quality — and all of this happens in the dynamic and multidimensional conversations that are increasingly possible in today’s learning environments.
  • School 1.0, where information is shared, but only in one direction.  Teachers and textbooks speak and illustrate.  Students simply nod their heads, by taking tests.
  • I can characterize it, and usually do by saying the School 2.0, like Web 2.0, is about conversation.

  5 more annotations...

Would you like to comment?

Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.