This link has been bookmarked by 4 people . It was first bookmarked on 26 Jul 2008, by Olivier Le Deuff.
-
25 Mar 09
-
Since it's clear enough that Wikipedia — and other sites based on reader-generated content — are too large and accessible to police themselves effectively, Liu argues that the responsibility for that policing should be adopted by the already existing structures of authority, including academe in particular.
-
Of course, Liu's presentation raises more questions than it answers: There are, after all, so many complications about the means by which credibility can be rated. We all know the peer-review system is not perfect.
But Liu's vision of a more public, collaborative, and service-oriented role for professors has considerable appeal to me, and it charts some of the steps that must now be taken into this new world of online knowledge production.
- 1 more annotations...
-
-
Essentially, the digital humanities seem to be a collective effort to use information technology to improve our understanding of the human experience. The field can do that using traditional methods — now made considerably easier and more accessible — such as the bibliography, the concordance, and the authoritative edition aimed at the production of essays and monographs by individual scholars.
But, more significantly, the digital humanities is also about the merger of scholarship from multiple disciplines with new tools for computation, visualization, and communications, often to create interactive projects that can appeal to people at varied levels of interest and expertise. The digital humanities have already begun to redefine what constitutes scholarship, authority, teaching, and merit in academe.
-
-
-
16 Jan 09
-
26 Jul 08
-
09 Jul 08
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.