This link has been bookmarked by 34 people . It was first bookmarked on 20 Mar 2009, by Thomas Vander Wal.
-
Ed BuclatinMmmmmmm, poor poor Sharepoint. So vilified, so loved, so "ish" at everything.
-
-
Cost and complexity.
- 3 more annotations...
-
-
Christophe DeschampsLe point de vue de Dion Hinchcliffe sur l'utilisation de Sharepoint pour aller vers l'E2.0
-
Joshua SalmonsMmmmmmm, poor poor Sharepoint. So vilified, so loved, so "ish" at everything.
-
Bryan LabuttaAn accurate blog post describing why SharePoint (MOSS) does not quite match up with other Enterprise 2.0 platforms, at least in its current state.
-
Miguel MembradoDeep analysis of what SharePoint Portal Server is able to do or to not do as an Enterprise 2.0 environment. By Dion Hinchcliffe.
-
-
These concerns about SharePoint’s ability to be an effective Enterprise 2.0 platform is one I hear echoed a lot with practitioners I talk to. In spite of this, I correspondingly hear that SharePoint is in fact what most organizations are planning on using when it comes to 2.0-style collaboration and knowledge management. Why the apparent disconnect between the perceived suitability (which we’ll dissect in a moment) and actual use? Part of it is SharePoint’s stunning penetration in the software business. T
-
In other words, SharePoint is already in most organizations today:
- 1 more annotations...
-
-
Hutch CarpenterThese concerns about SharePoint’s ability to be an effective Enterprise 2.0 platform is one I hear echoed a lot with practitioners I talk to. In spite of this, I correspondingly hear that SharePoint is in fact what most organizations are planning on using when it comes to 2.0-style collaboration and knowledge management. Why the apparent disconnect between the perceived suitability (which we’ll dissect in a moment) and actual use? Part of it is SharePoint’s stunning penetration in the software business.
-
-
Users should be able to create sites within SharePoint, customize them over time to meet the local requirements, and let them evolve and improve through shared contributions. It is, however, by no means impossible to enable this kind of self-service with SharePoint but it does not encourage it nor is it a core design principle for the product.
-
In fact, this is a central lesson in Web 2.0 design, that complexity is the enemy of ease-of-use and adoption; most 2.0 products are almost brutally simple in their user experience.
- 1 more annotations...
-
-
Martin LindnerDion Hinchcliffe's verdict on SharePoint: if read between the lines it turns out MOSS is a failure (for E2.0) and probably not much help in the overly-complicated E1.0 environment either, except for, well, sharing MS objects. -- "the enterprise 2.0 story
-
-
It increasingly appears there is no such thing as Enterprise 2.0-in-a-box
-
There seem to be countless choices when it comes to communication and collaborating in today’s workplace.
- 17 more annotations...
-
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.