This link has been bookmarked by 21 people . It was first bookmarked on 20 May 2007, by Joe Buhler.
-
28 Sep 11
-
05 Mar 09
-
Both conceptions do make one very important assumption, that all software is part of a larger ecosystem bigger than itself.
-
It’s an idea that basically states that software that goes naturally with the “grain” of the Web, extending the core infrastructure of the Web in natural ways, works the best.
-
Web has provided a more proven model for how to integrate our systems, design our products around our customers and communities, and focus on the aspects that are most important to our businesses. SOA provides a more engineered, predefined, and formal view, that satisfies perhaps a larger number of important technical criteria but often seems to miss the very point about what matters; that people are central to software and it’s our data that is irreplaceable and of supreme market advantage.
-
-
12 Nov 07
-
04 Sep 07
-
14 Jul 07
-
16 Jun 07
-
One of the biggest arguments against traditional SOA is that there are literally thousands of software platforms and enviroments that presently exist in the world. And if they don’t speak your unique flavor of SOA (SOAP and WS-*), interopability with them won’t (and doesn’t) happen.
With WOA, anyone that can speak HTTP — the fundamental protocol of the Web — and anyone that can process XML, which is to say just about every tool and platform that exists today, can interoperate and work together simply, safely, and easily and build applications on top of one another services. Importantly, mashups are a key outcome of the trend towards WOA and most mashups are based on REST or REST-like services.
-
-
15 Jun 07
-
14 Jun 07
-
12 Jun 07
-
11 Jun 07
-
21 May 07
-
20 May 07
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.