Skip to main content

Close
Get the best research tool on the web today,and free!
Connect with people with common interests!

saved by6 people, first byChristopher Sessums on 2006-08-08, last byMarion Walton on 2008-04-24

  • why virtual communities are considered important, and, second, what
    the characteristics of a virtual community are.
  • Then, we must determine if
    at least some blogs have these characteristics.
  • first, why virtual communities are considered important, and, second, what
    the characteristics of a virtual community are. Then, we must determine if
    at least some blogs have these characteristics.
  • virtual communities
    are considered important for social reasons
  • replace the relationships
    lost as people became more isolated from their neighbors
  • around the world
    who share similar interests
  • As people became more connected with others
    through these virtual communities, they would reap the benefits of social
    relationships with like minded others.
  • increase participation in face-to-face communities
  • there are arguments for and evidence of the positive social effects of virtual
    community participation.
  • “community” implies an emotionally positive effect
  • Information science professionals and
    psychologists argue that this positive emotion creates an intrinsically rewarding
    reason to continue participation in the group
  • Kuo, 2003; Whitworth & De Moor, 2003
  • more
    likely to be self-sustaining
  • The key, however, is that not all virtual
    groups are virtual communities.
  • Jones argues that we can understand virtual communities
    by understanding the artifacts of its virtual settlement: its postings, structure
    and content.
  • Jones (1997) proposes that a virtual settlement exists when there are a)
    a minimal number of b) public interactions c) with a variety of communicators
    in which d) there is a minimal level of sustained membership over a period
    of time.
  • if one finds a virtual
    settlement, then one has found a virtual community.
  • the feelings
    and social relationships that develop within the virtual settlement help distinguish
    a virtual community from a virtual group.
  • Blanchard and Markus (2003)
  • It is the sense of community that distinguishes virtual communities
    from mere virtual groups.
  • McMillan and Chavis
    (1986) have the most well-regarded and well-researched conceptualization of
    SOC.
    • Feelings of membership: Feelings of belonging to, and identifying with,
      the community;

    • Feelings of influence: Feelings of having influence on, and being influenced
      by, the community;

    • Integration and fulfillment of needs: Feelings of being supported by others
      in the community while also supporting them; and

    • Shared emotional connection: Feelings of relationships, shared history,
      and a “spirit” of community.
  • Feelings of membership
  • Feelings of influence
  • Integration and fulfillment of needs
  • Shared emotional connection
  • McMillan and Chavis’s definition is
    considered the strongest (Chipuer & Pretty, 1999)
    • Membership, boundaries,
      belonging, and group symbols (Baym, 1995, 1997; Curtis, 1997; Greer,
      2000; Herring, 1999; Kollock & Smith, 1996; Markus, Manville, & Agres,
      2000; Phillips, 1996);

    • Influence, in terms
      of enforcing and challenging norms (Baym, 1997; Kollock & Smith, 1996;
      Markus, 1994a, 1994b; McLaughlin, 1995; Pliskin, 1997);

    • Exchange of support
      among members (Baym, 1995, 1997; Greer, 2000; Preece,
      1999; Rheingold, 1993);

    • Shared emotional
      connections among members (Greer, 2000; Preece, 1999; Rheingold, 1993).
  • So there is evidence that SOC exists in
    virtual communities.
  • Can Blogs Be Virtual Communities?
  • first determine
    if blogs have the characteristics of a virtual settlement and then determine
    what their sense of community is.
  • This creates two opportunities
    for interaction on the blog for the readers: one with the blog author and
    one with other readers.
  • blogs can have links to other Internet
    sites
  • inks to websites to which the author
    refers in his/her entries
  • there are lists of other blogs that the blog author reads, a technological
    feature called a “blogroll.”
  • instead of the many-to-many
  • a one-to-many form of communication
    from the author to the readers
  • the lack of public interaction would preclude
    a blog from being a virtual settlement and, thus, from being a virtual community.
  • blogs do offer interactivity
  • the blog author may interact individually
    with his or her readers.
  • 1) that they have been added to someone’s blogroll and
    2) to identify who added them
  • blogs create
    a social network between themselves through their references links to each
    other.
  • although comments may not be stored
    on the main blog page, they are nevertheless included in a public space for
    many-to-many communication.
  • Lurkers are members of a virtual community who regularly participate by reading
    messages but do not contribute to the conversation.
  • Blanchard and Markus (2003) report that lurkers do have a clear sense of community within
    the virtual community, although it is weaker than that of the more active
    members.
  • would
    be similar.
  • may fit Jones’s (1997) definition of a virtual settlement.
  • Thus, a blog could be a virtual settlement.
  • This blog was hosted on Salon.com’s blogs
    and was regularly one of the most popular blogs[2].
  • The blog is entertaining, profane, informative,
    and very, very, funny.
  • Julie would sometimes respond to the comments; other
    commenters would also respond to each others’ comments.
  • many other blogs and web sites had links
    to her blog.
  • Thus, the Julie/Julia Project is a virtual settlement.
  • a web survey was conducted of the blog readers.
  • These
    hits do not each account for individual readers of the blog, as they also
    represent multiple visits from individual readers.
  • “Other readers and
    I want the same thing from this blog,” “I think this is a good blog to read”
    and “I recognize the names of most readers who post comments on this blog.”
  • n order to assess interactivity,
  • Demographic information
  • open ended questions about why they read about the Julie/Julia Project
    and what they felt about it.
  • To survey readers, I contacted Julie Powell
    who agreed to participate in the study. She posted a link to the web survey
    twice over a one week period. She also encouraged readers to fill out the
    survey.
  • (Cronbach’s α = .72).
  • Sense of community is reliably correlated
    to all of the demographic variables and each of the four predictors.
  • the magnitude of the sense of community
  • sense of community was regressed on each of the
    variables in a two step hierarchical regression.
  • length of time and frequency
    of reading the blog are the strongest predictors of sense of community.
  • Reading and posting to comments also predict sense
    of community, but not as strongly. The demographic variables do not account
    for any of the sense of community variance once the predictor variables have
    been entered.
  • the members reported a moderate sense of community
  • It is certainly a virtual settlement.
  • comments revealed very strong and very positive feelings
    the blog:
  • did believe that the Julie/Julia Project was
    a virtual community
  • many others did not
  • Those
    members who felt that the Julie/Julia Project was
    a community did so because of their participation in the comments.
  • ited in the amount of public interaction
  • ing a traditional
    measure of FtF sense of community, for the most part, it is not. However,
    for a vocal and active minority of the respondents, it is. For these members,
    social connections were made and emotional attachments were established. But
    for the majority of participants, particularly those who did not read or contribute
    to the comments
  • traditional
    measure of FtF sense of community
  • For these members,
    social connections were made and emotional attachments were established.
  • This finding is quite different from Blanchard
    and Markus’ (2003) finding that lurkers have a clear, albeit weaker, sense of
    community in other virtual communities.
  • may
    lie in the CMC technology
  • The Julie/Julia Project was
    not self-sustaining. It depended heavily on Julie to succeed.
  • These findings have implications for our
    understanding of the importance of sense of community in determining whether
    or not a virtual group can be correctly called a virtual community.
  • was a highly successful
    blog.
  • Without a critical mass of engaged,
    connected, and attached participants, its survival depended primarily on the
    blog author alone.
  • Their main challenge may be in providing public
    spaces for member interaction.
  • Additionally, blogrolls (which the Julie/Julia Project did
    not have) could increase public interactions by increasing interactions between
    different blogs.
  • Interactive blogrolls connecting blogs with
    highly active comments’ sections may create communities of blogs who share
    an audience.
  • d then expect to see the benefits
    in terms of increased social relationships and sustainability
  • Blogs are the newest popular form of group
    CMC technology
  • Future studies of blogs as virtual communities should
    continue to assess not only members’ sense of community, but also how members
    adapt to and modify the CMC technology to meet their needs in developing a
    vibrant virtual community.
  • self-sustaining
    virtual communities.
  • sense of community
  • Blanchard, A., & Markus, M. L. (2003).
    The experienced "sense" of a virtual community: Characteristics
    and processes. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems.
  • on 2006-08-08 Csessums
    Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs: