Skip to main content

Diigo Home

Thomas verdict: willful infringement, $1.92 million penalty - Ars Technica - The Diigo Meta page

arstechnica.com/...mie-thomas-retrial-verdict.ars - Cached

This link has been bookmarked by 6 people . It was first bookmarked on 18 Jun 2009, by Alexandre Mateus.

  • 20 Jun 09
    erudite
    Erudite
    • all 24 copyrights controlled by the four major record labels at issue in the case.
      • Erudite

        Erudite on 2009-06-20

        The 24 files that incurred the $1.92M penalty can be found here:

        http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4965154

        Note: It may be a violation of civil law to link to material that infringes on copy right. This is a link to a link, which has not ben litigated...

    • The evidence clearly pointed to her machine, even correctly identifying the MAC address of both her cable modem and her computer's Ethernet port. When combined with the facts about her hard drive replacement (and her failure to disclose those facts to the investigators), her "tereastarr" username
  • edtechtalk
    edtechtalk

    jm: "A new lawyer, a new jury, and a new trial were not enough to save Jammie Thomas-Rasset. In a repeat of the verdict from her first federal trial, Thomas-Rasset was found liable for willfully infringing all 24 copyrights controlled by the four major record labels at issue in the case. The jury awarded the labels damages totaling a whopping $1.92 million.

    copyright legal jm 20090621

    • A new lawyer, a new jury, and a new trial were not enough to save Jammie Thomas-Rasset. In a repeat of the verdict from her first federal trial, Thomas-Rasset was found liable for willfully infringing all 24 copyrights controlled by the four major record labels at issue in the case. The jury awarded the labels damages totaling a whopping $1.92 million. As the dollar amount was read in court, Thomas-Rasset gasped and her eyes widened
    • The recording industry lawyers, though clearly pleased, had no desire to showboat this one. The massive damage award, which increased from $9,250 per song in the first trial to $80,000, might sounds like a "win," but will probably stoke grassroots anger against the industry's campaign... if the music business tries to collect. There are hints that it might not.
  • 19 Jun 09
    ifroggy
    Patrick O'Keefe
    • As for Thomas-Rasset, she appeared shaken by the verdict but didn't blame the jury. "They did their job," she said, "I'm not going to hold it against them." She added, though, that the recording industry would never collect the money. "Good luck trying to get it from me... it's like squeezing blood from a turnip."
    • Spokesperson Cara Duckworth of the RIAA, who attended the trial, told reporters afterwards, "Since day one we have been willing to settle this case... and we remain willing to do so." The industry appears to be doing everything it can not to appear vindictive in these cases, though Duckworth refused to discuss any details of what a proposed settlement might look like.
  • plagiarismtoday
    Jonathan Bailey

    116 thomas verdict lawsuit riaa

  • aamirikram
    aamir ikram

    A new lawyer, a new jury, and a new trial were not enough to save Jammie Thomas-Rasset. In a repeat of the verdict from her first federal trial, Thomas-Rasset was found liable for willfully infringing all 24 copyrights controlled by the four major record labels at issue in the case. The jury awarded the labels damages totaling a whopping $1.92 million. As the dollar amount was read in court, Thomas-Rasset gasped and her eyes widened.

    copyright lawyer law firms litigation laws

  • 18 Jun 09
    amfmateus
    Alexandre Mateus

    p2p piracy jammie thomas 2009

Top Tags