This link has been bookmarked by 266 people . It was first bookmarked on 16 Feb 2007, by Matt Kramer.
-
10 Feb 14
-
05 Apr 12
-
27 Sep 11
-
20 Apr 11
-
02 Apr 11
-
08 Mar 11
-
08 Feb 11
s. farooq razvipolitics blog blogs news opinion daily dish dailydish the atlantic theatlantic roll blogroll list lists about on andrew sullivan interesting cool fascinating toread toview central summary synopsis synthesis dailynews internet web tocheck todiscover toexplore
politics blog blogs news opinion daily dish dailydish the atlantic theatlantic roll blogroll list lists about on andrew sullivan interesting cool fascinating toread toview central summary synopsis synthesis dailynews internet web tocheck todiscover toexpl
-
07 Feb 11
-
When we’re feeling positive, we remember that he used to say, “Libertarianism is the heart and soul of conservatism.” Other times, we call to mind his military interventionism, his encouragement of the then-new religious right (“I know you can’t endorse me, but I endorse you.”), and his failure to really reduce the size of government. But the more experience we have with later presidents, the better Reagan looks in retrospect.
-
-
17 Jan 11
-
07 Jan 11
-
29 Dec 10
-
07 Dec 10
-
23 Nov 10
-
“Finish each day and be done with it. You have done what you could; some blunders and absurdities have crept in; forget them as soon as you can. Tomorrow is a new day; you shall begin it serenely and with too high a spirit to be encumbered with your old nonsense.”
-
I preferred it to rugby, which is proof enough, I guess, of cowardice. We used to run literally away from the rugby fields, across a small road, and into the Surrey hills, often in the pouring rain. After a few hundred yards, my asthma would kick in; after a mile or so, it either cleared up, or I'd have to find shelter in the secret copse some had made into a refuge in the woods. You'd find someone there usually, smoking a cigarette or huddled over some porn. I'd catch my breath, and artfully miss a few laps around the bottom of the hill, then try and slip back into the field, without the teacher noticing. We had it pretty much down. The boys, if not the teachers, knew that Sullivan couldn't breathe, so gave me a pass.
It's still so vivid in my mind: the mud, the autumn leaves, the panicked lungs, and, in my teens, the sense of such cheerful inclusion among all these horny boys, and yet also so much silent displacement. The porn was not for me.
-
A parallel: you believe in showing photos of the actual carnage war causes, dead men, women and children. This word is the linguistic equivalent of that, and when the psychological carnage caused by slurs like "faggot" and "nigger" are the very subject of your discourse, use the word.
-
"I was happy to see that Newt Gingrich has staked out a position on the war, a position, or two, or maybe three. I don’t know. I think he has more war positions than he’s had wives. [...] There’s a big debate over there. Fox News can’t decide, what do they love more, bombing the Middle East or bashing the president? It’s like I was over there and there was an anchor going, they were pleading, can’t we do both? Can’t we bomb the Middle East and bash the president at the same time?" - Senator Rand Paul.
-
-
15 Nov 10
joe mcgillYes, you can pool on one page as many connective writers as you can. Every day at the Dish, you get reminded of the other writers at the Atlantic and can read them - and are far more likely to read them than if they were scattered around the web. But that
-
19 Sep 10
-
Christianists believe in the literal truth of oral mistranscribed centuries-old hearsay in the Bible, but not in a documented, proven historical fact in their own lifetimes.
-
-
06 Sep 10
-
04 Sep 10
-
31 Aug 10
-
22 Aug 10
-
11 Aug 10
-
For those of us in the junior college ranks, however, I think there is a more concrete reason for the lean left, rather than the abstract leftism offered in certain courses we took as students.
-
I think the basic underlying division today among foreign policy elites is simply between those who have internalized America's relative decline and the limits of hard power revealed in the last decade ... and those who haven't.
-
Individuals, no matter in what context, want to belong, want to be accepted. We are also social animals, perceptive enough to realize the responses that will get positive feedback in whatever context we find ourselves.
-
I don't have empathy for poor people because I read Sinclair Lewis or Karl Marx; I have it because I work in an environment in which I see them at their best.
-
What matters at the end of the day is action. While drawing someone out elicits some progress toward reasonable debate, that same individual's actions are rarely so measured. Human behavior is only occasionally rational, and, ultimately, action -- in the form of voting and other political activity -- affects us far more than any of your exercises in experimentation with talk-radio audiences.
-
Any one can flatter reason when he is prompted to do so. But how many of us act reasonably in the face of fear, hysteria, misinformation, groupthink and hatespeech? And how many of us are drawn to such forces?
-
Of the 2.3 million people in American jails, 806,000 are black males. African-Americans--males and females--make up .6 percent of the entire world's population, but African-American males--alone--make up 8 percent of the entire world's prison population
-
This is a constitution specifically designed to make warfare rare. But we now live in a permanent war, and each time it ebbs, a president comes in to add to the fire. When you have that kind of power, the temptation to use it can be overwhelming. I know that the Congress has ceded its Constitutional responsibilities in this respect to the president in recent times. But the Constitution is clear enough - and has not been amended. And its essential abeyance for so many years is one reason this republic has become an empire; and an empire requires an emperor. If a man like Obama succumbs to this temptation, the ball-game is over.
-
the great failing of today's atheists is a lack of respect for the alternative: which is, as Damon writes, not the use of faith as some kind of crutch for less anxious living and dying, but the belief that being human is not simply about our rationality, that
a Christian believes that the experience of suffering discloses essential truths that cannot be discovered or known in any other way. What are these truths? That we are fundamentally weak and needy creatures. That we are anxious animals, longing for someone or something to soothe us, to protect us from and relieve us of our worries.
Christianity's radical claim is that it is in suffering alone that we approach the truth about our ultimate condition, just as Jesus' intense suffering on the Cross makes sense only as an act of God's solidarity with us in this mortal, existential panic. The position you take on this cannot be reduced to an argument. It is much deeper than that.
-
But for me, it is the fear too that informs us, the dread and the pain and the loneliness of dying and suffering. The moments I have felt closest to God have been when I have been stripped of every security, the moments when I have felt no love, known no safe home, witnessed unspeakable cruelty - and was rescued by nothing but his ineffable, boundless and yet intimate Love.
This is not an argument, I know. It can easily be dismissed as wish-fulfillment. I beg of you only to respect that this is not how I experienced these moments. They were real. In suffering, I have felt and known God reach into my life and grab me by the scruff of my neck and shake me with the brusque affection of a father's compassion. "Andrew, Andrew ... you fret and are anxious about so many things. But only one thing is necessary."
-
the best insight I can offer into my work is its premise: that a writer's job is to strive for the truth, and to remember that he'll sometimes be wrong. As a result, I am reticent to characterize myself politically on occasions when I'm really being asked, "Whose side are you on?" The answer to that question should never be "the liberal side" or "the conservative side," unless the person being questioned is naive enough to think that one ideology or the other has a monopoly on truth.
-
The sense of overload is a failure of our focus rather than the fault of information itself or the various media. Calling it “attention” in the contemporary sense and economizing it doesn’t repair focus so much as redefine it as a shorter span, as inherently fickle and ephemeral.
-
You can think of patriotism as a kind of status socialism—a collectivization of the means of self-esteem production. You don’t have to graduate from an Ivy or make a lot of money to feel proud or special about being an American; you don’t have to do a damn thing but be born here.
-
Cultural valorization of “American-ness” relative to other status markers, then, is a kind of redistribution of psychological capital to those who lack other sources of it.
-
people want high-status figures to invest in building the brand of their shared identity—a sort of status redistribution as noblese oblige.
-
Politicians have limited time horizons. If the annual probability of some catastrophe is 1 percent, and a politician’s horizon is 5 years, he will be reluctant to support significant expenditures to reduce the likelihood or magnitude of the catastrophe, because to do so would involve supporting either higher taxes or a reallocation of government expenditures from services that provide immediate benefits to constituents.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10 Aug 10
-
30 Jul 10
-
he Founders' Burkean inspiration that true and lasting progress must pass the tests of peaceful struggle and tireless debate.
-
st and overanxious progress in a consensual void only insures its unravelin
-
ut he's the best we've got, and we are lucky to have him.
-
r. Obama may not be the politician of our dreams, but his enemies are definitely the stuff of our nightma
-
-
27 Jul 10
-
17 Jul 10
-
Andrew Haynes offers some nice cocktail conversation fodder for the holidays:
[The reindeer] goes to great lengths to search out the hallucino
-
-
-
11 Jul 10
-
16 Jun 10
-
15 Jun 10
-
17 May 10
-
02 May 10
-
09 Apr 10
-
-
Scepticism is integral to the scientific process, because most claims turn out to be false. Weeding out the few kernels of wheat from the large pile of chaff requires extensive observation, careful experimentation and cautious inference. Science is scepticism and good scientists are sceptical.
-
There was and is something about these words - engaged, married, husband - even though they may contain a mountain of different experiences, that made us a family. I think conservatives should favor the unification and mutual love and support of families. And that means they must by definition favor the mutual love and support of the gay people in them.
This is not about creating something new. It is about making a home for people who have been here all the time for centuries. It is about making the human family whole.
-
-
-
Catherine Mohr reminds us that the greenest option often isn't obvious:
-
-
conservatism is about applying a skepticism toward government with a desire to make government work.
-
Proposing Reaganite solutions for a situation radically different than the late 1970s is not conservative. It's a form of neurotic religion. Reagan wouldn't have supported it. And my fear is David's: that the right today is rewarding those least interested in government, and more interested in peddling a lucrative alternative reality. Conservatism has become entertainment. Palin is its celebreality star. Whatever else this is, it is not politics and it is not conservatism.
-
-
-
-
07 Apr 10
-
06 Apr 10
-
D.T. Max reports on the mysteries and secrets of sleep:
If we can't sleep, perhaps it's because we've forgotten how. In premodern times people slept differently, going to bed at sunset and rising with the dawn. In winter months, with so long to rest, our ancestors may have broken sleep up into chunks. In developing countries people still often sleep this way. They bed down in groups and get up from time to time during the night. Some sleep outside, where it is cooler and the effect of sunlight on our circadian rhythm is more direct. In 2002, Carol Worthman and Melissa Melby of Emory University published a comparative survey of how people sleep in a variety of cultures. They found that among foraging groups such as the Kung and Efe, "the boundaries of sleep and waking are very fluid." There is no fixed bedtime, and no one tells anyone else to go to sleep. Sleepers get up when a conversation or musical performance intrudes on their rest and intrigues them. They might join in, then nod off again.
-
With the caveat that every situation is different, one factor we think deserves more attention is the role of testosterone (T) in middle-aged men’s eroticism. In their twenties, men’s T levels begin a long decline, often experienced as diminished passion and appetite for life. Suppressed T levels are associated with depression, heart attacks, dementia, and overall mortality rates from 88 to 250 percent higher. One of the few things that can reliably and immediately revive a man’s sagging testosterone is exposure to a new woman. One researcher found that even a brief chat with an attractive woman raised men’s testosterone levels by fourteen percent within minutes. In Sex at Dawn, we suggest that many men may be confusing the hormonal changes triggered by an affair with actual “love,” thus leading them to make ill-advised decisions catastrophic to their families, their marriages, and eventually themselves.
-
Once you buy into the logic of authority, it is extremely hard to question its abuse.
-
Quote For The Day
22 Jun 2010 09:43 am"If I were given carte blanche to write about any topic I could, it would be about how much our ignorance, in general, shapes our lives in ways we do not know about. Put simply, people tend to do what they know and fail to do that which they have no conception of. In that way, ignorance profoundly channels the course we take in life. And unknown unknowns constitute a grand swath of everybody's field of ignorance," - David Dunning. -
Jonah Lehrer finds Shirky's latest book wanting:
While Shirky pokes fun at [lolcats], he still argues that it represents a dramatic improvement over the passive entertainment of television. "The real gap is between doing nothing and doing something, and someone making lolcats has bridged that gap."
There are two things to say about this. The first is that the consumption of culture is not always worthless. Is it really better to produce yet another lolcat than watch The Wire? And what about the consumption of literature? By Shirky's standard, reading a complex novel is no different than imbibing High School Musical, and both are less worthwhile than creating something stupid online. While Shirky repeatedly downplays the importance of quality in creative production--he argues that mediocrity is a necessary side effect of increases in supply--I'd rather consume greatness than create yet another unfunny caption for a cat picture.
-
So what are young conservatives—or liberals or political agnostics—who read this book going to get out of it? What they will learn, and it is a terrible thing, is that the questions that we ask in our youth—in our twenties—may be the only ones we ever really ask. Kristol, from the very beginning, is asking himself only a handful of questions. Stalinism having been rejected as abhorrent, is there a coherent left? How can a democratic society be made virtuous? (He seems from the beginning to be more interested in this question than in how it may be made prosperous, or free, or equal.) And what did being Jewish mean to a man in the modern age—given that it clearly did mean something to him, from the first, and given that fidelity either to Jewish tradition or to Jewish nationalism was not what it meant?
That is terrible enough: that we will spend the rest of our lives asking the same few questions from our twenties over and over. But if the bulk of the book is any indication, the greater risk is that we will think we have answered them.
-
-
03 Apr 10
-
06 Mar 10
-
01 Mar 10
-
26 Feb 10
-
18 Feb 10
Frida LeeAndrew Sullivan dishes. Includes Andrew's Daily Dish, interviews, recent articles about the war, homosexuality, culture, politics, faith, and people.
|Hemeroteca| Blogs|Indymedias USA |Humanidades| Politics Culture Religion Voices|Ideas Imported
-
17 Feb 10
-
22 Jan 10
-
21 Jan 10
-
13 Dec 09
-
24 Oct 09
-
12 Oct 09
-
So he's a liberaltarian from nowhere who represents for many people the most positive force for change. Do we have Britain's Barack Obama in Nick Clegg?
-
I think the real question on, say, the resurrection is: what does it actually mean? The imperfect scriptural accounts are full of contradictions. Jesus is both clearly bodily resurrected when Thomas places his hand in his open wound. Yet on the road to Emmaeus, Jesus is somehow incarnated in a different body and the recognition comes only at the breaking of bread. Elsewhere, Jesus appears as some kind of ghost, at others like flesh and blood person. And what of the Transfiguration? Are these metaphorical stories? Are they literally true and yet contradictory?
What Pascal called the "usage et soumission de la raison" is the best approach. But, yes, in the end, faith is a spiritual gift, not a logical conclusion.
-
here's still a chance, I think, that fear of re-electing Brown may cause a last minute defection to the Tories by some Lib-Dems.
-
Hart would like us to believe that anyone who hasn't spent years meditating on Aquinas and Nietzsche isn't worth engaging with, but walk into any Christian church in America — or the world — and you'll find it full of people who understand God much the same way Hitchens and Dawkins do, not the way Hart does. That's the reality of the religious experience for the vast majority of believers. To call a foul on those who want to engage with this experience — with the world as it is, rather than with Hart's abstract graduate seminar version of the world — is to insist that nonbelievers forfeit the game without even taking the field.
-
aid they would do. But we also need an organization that can work from the inside. So the real question is, would we be closer to equality without HRC? I believe the answer is NO! I will continue to support HRC because I think it is making a difference. I will continue to read your blog because it is entertaining and informative. And I hope your readers who disagree with HRC's tactics will continue their activism. But those who spend energy on criticizing HRC while doing nothing constructive toward reaching equality are hurting the cause, not helping it.
-
Norm Geras explains why he is voting for Labour:
Labour's record on poverty unmatched - and social justice trumps other considerations unless these are of an exceptional and urgent kind.
-
Many of my friends believe I have abandoned supply side economics and become a Keynesian. (Among conservatives there are few insults more damning than to be labeled a "Keynesian.") But as I try to explain in my book, my views haven't changed at all; it's circumstances that have changed. I believe that my friends are still stuck in the 1970s when tax rates were considerably higher and excessive demand (i.e., inflation) was our biggest economic problem. Today, tax rates are much lower and a lack of demand (i.e., deflation) is the central problem. I really don't understand why conservatives insist on a one-size-fits-all economic policy consisting of more and bigger tax cuts no matter what the economic circumstances are; it's simply become dogma totally disconnected from reality.
-
I've never seen Colbert so clearly become his own character on the question of impugning the honor of American soldiers. I don't doubt that his experience with the troops affected him on this question.
-
Any movement that claims to represent "Real Americans" but is 98 percent white is by definition going to have a definition of Americanness that is partially defined by race. Whether you call them "Real Americans" or "The Silent Majority," we all know what we're really talking about. Pat Buchanan's saving grace is that he's always had the stones to give the state of things without equivocation or evasion, without grasping for the plausible deniability of putting a few nonwhite speakers on the stage in order to foster the perception of diversity.
-
I'm against hate crime laws - every single one of them. I also understand and respect the argument for them, even as I strongly disagree. But what you cannot coherently hold is that there should be hate crime protections for people of faith and no hate crime protections for gays. Even if you believe, erroneously, that homoesxuality is a choice, so, obviously, is religion. The GOP's current position - against hate crime laws only when they apply to gays (even with strong guarantees of freedom of speech and religion) - is pure animus. It's bigotry - and it's coming from the very top.
-
"We are the party of the National Health Service today because we not only back the values of the NHS, we back its funding and we have a vision for its future."
-
Dwight Ozard, one of my best friends (who has since died of cancer), wrote an article in 1997 when he was editor of Prism Magazine, "America's Alternative Evangelical Voice," that relates to this topic of Hipster Christianity. The piece was entitled "Rethinking Church To Rescue The Gospel," and I pass it along because I love this line:
-
For those of us who still believe in the church, our job is not its defense, but its reform...What will that mean? I’m not entirely sure, but here are a few ideas. First, the solution cannot be cosmetic. Simply updating or altering our aging hymnody, liturgies or idiosyncratic language will not make us relevant. (In fact, superficial attempts at relevancy only magnify our irrelevancy in our ever-changing culture - nothing is more annoying than an old guy trying to look young and hip.) No, reform must reach to the core of our vision of what it means to be a believer in America or it will fail. We will fool no one.
-
For years I've said that the gay rights movement should rid itself of victimology and one-party reliance. The major obstacle has been the GOP itself.
-
McCracken is correct to differentiate between "the authentic and the wannabe." The clearest example to me is the prevalence of "worship bands" at churches. Do they pass the sniff test? In other words, I've been to churches where the people of that church grew up listening to rock/pop/folk music or whatever and the people in the band are obviously talented musicians and have a sensitivity to how to create a worshipful atmosphere. This can feel authentic. But then you go to another church where they obviously have a "worship band" because they feel they should and its a shoe that doesn't fit ... and it feels fake.
-
The YouTube video was made by a fan of Sufjan Stevens' "Abraham," from his Christian-themed album Seven Swans. Sufjan is pretty much the king of Christian hipsterdom (and one of the great folk musicians of the millennials). If anyone knows of other quality Christian music that passes the reader's "sniff test," please pass along.
-
reform but reformation.
-
Today marks the 65th anniversary of the United States dropping an atom bomb on Nagasaki, killing 74,000 people and precipitating the end of World War II. James Poulos reacts to a Japanese gentleman who wants an apology:
I confess the purpose escapes me of an official apology for the atom bombing of Japan. "We're sorry we didn't follow through with plans for a massively bloody and protracted invasion of Japan, accompanied, as no doubt it would be, by conventional carpet bombings and city-wide firestorms." Hmm. "We're sorry that you proved so unwilling to surrender Iwo Jima and Okinawa that we thought twice about how to win the war of aggression that you started against us." Could enlist the support of our customer service industry? "We're sorry that you feel that way." Atomic warfare is obviously horrific, and we should all be very pleased that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the last of it. But apologies mean the guilty party should've done something else, because that something else would have been better for everyone.
-
In what could be a South Park parody but sadly isn't, the Wiesenthal Center behind the Museum of Tolerance - which opened in Manhattan last week - slams the Cordoba center for insensitivity. Meanwhile ... :
In Jerusalem, Israel - where the Wiesenthal Center plans to open its next Museum of Tolerance - construction of the proposed tolerance museum has “resulted in digging up the remains of people who had been buried in a Muslim cemetery for generations,” [professor Marnia] Lazreg said. “I am not sure that I would have chosen a site close to Ground Zero for building a mosque and cultural center, although there is no law against doing so,” she said. “But we have to be fair …. The mosque-center promoters have not engaged in acts of physical desecration of the victims of 9/11 attacks.”
-
This is amazing to me. If Obama did not get the money from BP, he'd be a useless Carter. Now that he has, he's a commie. And this is also part of his core political skill. He drives his opponents mad, and in the end, their total incoherence and malice will hurt them. In the end, because he won't take the Modo bait, the destruction of the populist ideological right will be more effective and profound because it will be self-destruction. Yes, this means that you have to endure these loonies posturing and making shit loads of money from it for the foreseeable future. But that merely requires steel and patience. Maybe some Democrats, liberal cable hosts and bloggers could do with a little more of both.
-
“I know what America is. America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction,” - Binyamin Netanyahu, in a just-released and secretly taped private meeting in 2001. He also reveals his approach to the Palestinians:
“beat them up, not once but repeatedly, beat them up so it hurts so badly, until it’s unbearable.”
And so Operation Cast Lead makes more sense, doesn't it? He also describes how the notion that the Palestinians destroyed the Oslo process was a cover for his own sabotage:
Netanyahu exposed the naked truth to his hosts at Ofra: he destroyed the Oslo accords with his own hands and deeds, and he's even proud of it. After years in which we were told that the Palestinians are to blame, the truth has emerged from the horse's mouth.
And how did he do it? He recalled how he conditioned his signing of the 1997 Hebron agreement on American consent that there be no withdrawals from "specified military locations," and insisted he choose those same locations, such as the whole of the Jordan Valley, for example. "Why is that important? Because from that moment on I stopped the Oslo Accords," he boasts. ...
He calls then-U.S. President Bill Clinton "extremely pro-Palestinian," and says the Palestinians want to throw us into the sea. With such retrograde beliefs, no one can convincingly argue that he wants an agreement.
Netanyahu wants and has always wanted total Israeli control of the West Bank for ever, and believes in using the United States as a means to advance Israeli interests in the Middle East, whether they conform to US interests or not. Any administration that believes, as Obama patheticallly just said he did, that Netanyahu is “ready to take risks for peace” is engaged in naive fantasies. The man has contempt for America, seeing his country's prime ally not as a country to be supported and engaged, but a country to be pushed around and lied to. So when will Obama stand up for his own country against this charlatan?
-
-
06 Sep 09
-
30 Aug 09
-
28 Aug 09
-
28 Jul 09
-
05 Jul 09
-
24 Jun 09
-
22 Jun 09
-
21 Jun 09
-
20 Jun 09
-
17 Jun 09
-
16 Jun 09
-
15 Jun 09
-
-
11 Jun 09
-
10 Jun 09
-
24 May 09
-
12 May 09
-
08 May 09
-
01 May 09
-
19 Apr 09
-
15 Apr 09
-
10 Apr 09
-
07 Mar 09
-
02 Mar 09
-
24 Feb 09
-
23 Feb 09
-
19 Feb 09
-
18 Feb 09
-
17 Feb 09
-
15 Feb 09
-
28 Jan 09
-
24 Jan 09
-
18 Jan 09
-
16 Jan 09
-
07 Jan 09
-
05 Jan 09
-
31 Dec 08
-
30 Dec 08
-
16 Dec 08
-
04 Dec 08
-
23 Nov 08
Justin WhitakerFind politics and much, much more at this libertarian-leaning blog written by Glenn Reynolds.
-
07 Nov 08
-
03 Nov 08
Page Comments
Venham Conhecer a Nova Temporada da http://www.jogando.net/mu/ na versão Season6, com muitas Novidades, Eventos, Itens e Muito mais, para os jogadores do http://www.jogando.net/mu/
Super - 10.000x
Pvp 15.000x
Very Easy - 5.000x
Hard 100 x
Extreme 10x
War 1000x
Novo Sever: Phoenix Ep.3 3.000x (32k stats) Acumulativo
Algumas Novidades:
-> Castle Siege, agora o GM da guild vencedora ganha SET exclusivo.
-> Fique logado e ganhe golds, Free ganha 1 GOLD por minuto e VIP 2 GOLDs.
-> Novo mapa Karutan com novos MOBs, drops exclusivos e muita XP.
-> Ganhe Chaos Castle e receba itens ancients.
-> Novo char Range Fighter
-> Novos PVPs
-> Novo Vip Premium
-> Novos Mapas
-> Novos rankings será implantado
-> Nova skin no forum com novas opções.
-> Novas Asas, Ring e Pendats 5 Socket
-> Novos Kits Fusion V2, Shield Pv3, Kit Mysthical e ItensSupremo Diamond (raro) Apenas 100 será vendidos
-> Novos Sets especial de Time de Futebol com o melhor preço
-> Vem ai, 6° MegaUltraSuperHiper Evento de Castle Siege Premiado com mais de 21.000 Jcash + Troféus e Medalhas.
>> CADASTRE-SE E GANHE 5 DIAS DE VIP <<
ENTRE JÁ NO SITE : www.jogando.net/mu/index.php?s=cadastrar
By: xXxEmOxXx
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.