I question the TV watching skills. There's much to intelligence "reading" of TV.
This link has been bookmarked by 2 people . It was first bookmarked on 22 Dec 2008, by Clay Burell.
-
22 Dec 08
-
-
Add Sticky Note
Postman offers a wide-ranging perspective on events and trends from 18 th, 19 th , and 20 th centuries. He reminds us, for instance, of the concept of tabula rasa: “Locke wanted education to result in a rich, varied, and copious book; Rousseau wanted education to result in a healthy flower. … Children are [today seen as] neither blank tablets nor budding plants. They are markets; that is to say, consumers whose needs for products are roughly the same as the needs of adults.” Children are not seen as members of society with special requirements, but just another market segment. Postman looks at how the nature of education has changed; he points out some serious short-comings he finds in contemporary educational practices. Viewed from a slightly different perspective, children are not simply a market segment but a largely passive audience for an expanding use of technology. And education’s own increasing reliance on technology poses a serious short-coming. He writes, “Before the printing press, children became adults by learning to speak, for which all people are biologically programmed. After the printing press, children had to earn adulthood by achieving literacy, for which people are not biologically programmed. This meant that schools had to be created. … And it is my contention that with the assistance of other media such as radio, film, and records, television has the power to lead us to childhood’s end. … There is no need for any preparation or prerequisite training for watching television … . Watching television requires no skills and develops no skills. That is why there is no such thing as remedial television-watching.” -
-
Add Sticky Note
What should we do to bring some sense of integrity (in the sense of integratedness) back into school? Firstly, Postman wants us to remember the importance of a historical narrative. That narrative provides continuity and connections and above all context. We don’t have to re-invent ourselves with each new generation (baby-boomers, baby-busters, Gen-X). We have a long history and a valuable collection of lessons-learned. We would do well to remember the story and build on it. On the other hand, we can’t assume that we have discovered The Truth in that narrative. So, secondly, to balance that narrative we need to introduce (or re-introduce?) critical thinking into the school curriculum as a useful response to mindless viewing of technology or listening to the narrative. “Wisdom,” he reminds us, “means knowing what questions to ask about knowledge. … Wisdom does not imply having the right answers. It implies only asking the right questions.” -
This is why I'm such a huge proponent of narrative history and interdisciplinary studies.
-
-
Students need to understand the need to be both answer-givers and question-askers.
-
Public Stiky Notes
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.